OverviewChainsCuratorsVaultsMarketsAssetsMethodology

Curators

27 active curators managing $1.59B across 11 chains · $62.5M borrow interest captured annually · $4.2M in fees

Concentration
CR3
89.8%
CR5
95.3%
HHI
2,869
highly concentrated
Largest AUM
$587.67M · 37.0% of Morpho-wide
Highest Borrow Interest Captured
$22.18M annualized
Highest Fee Take Rate
24.8% of interest kept
Highest Net APY Delivered
4.80% to depositors
Most Multi-Chain
9 chains
Fastest AUM Growth 30d
+4124.1% over 30d

Curator AUM Over Time

Top curator: Gauntlet at $587.67M (37.0%): -3.6% in 30 days

Gauntlet
Steakhouse Financial
SparkDAO
Felix
Yearn
Hakutora
Pangolins
Anthias Labs
MEV Capital
Clearstar
Other

Curator Economics

Cross-sectional view of curator performance

CuratorAUMBorrow Int.Curator FeesFee Take RateNet APYAUM 30d Δ
Gauntlet$587.67M$22.18M$151.81K0.7%3.75%-3.6%
Steakhouse Financial$523.94M$20.24M$2.09M10.3%3.46%-8.3%
SparkDAO$315.25M$13.47M$1.31M9.7%3.85%+4124.1%
Felix$57.93M$2.59M$258.88K10.0%4.01%-22.9%
Yearn$30.06M$1.41M$60.27K4.3%4.80%-14.7%
Hakutora$26.19M$1.01M$151.68K15.0%3.27%+9.2%
Pangolins$11.87M$507.2K$50.72K10.0%3.84%-43.4%
Anthias Labs$10.58M$293.36K$43.9K15.0%2.54%-44.3%
MEV Capital$8.65M$276.94K$27.39K9.9%2.88%-11.3%
Clearstar$6.39M$167.36K$41.47K24.8%1.96%-5.6%
Hyperithm$2.61M$188.08K$18.81K10.0%6.45%-9.8%
Waterline$1.76M$92.04K$4.6K5.0%5.44%-6.5%
RE7 Labs$1.13M$521.22$52.1210.0%0.04%+18.3%
AlphaPing$947.61K$53.67K$25.08K46.7%2.97%-61.4%
UltraYield$787.16K$39.63K$00.0%5.03%+88.2%

Curator Structural Identity

What each curator's book is composed of (by loan asset)

CuratorSTABLELSTLRTBTCETHRWAOTHER
Gauntlet89%··5%5%·2%
Steakhouse Financial94%0%·0%6%·0%
SparkDAO100%······
Felix67%·····33%
Yearn83%··13%4%·0%
Hakutora100%······
Pangolins100%······
Anthias Labs55%··6%39%··
MEV Capital35%··0%54%·11%
Clearstar98%···2%·0%
Hyperithm100%··0%0%·0%
Waterline100%······
RE7 Labs19%··7%73%·1%
AlphaPing73%···27%·1%
UltraYield100%······

Curator Performance Landscape

Fee take rate vs net APY delivered · bubble size = AUM

Stablecoins
ETH
Other
· bubble size = AUM

Curator Share. Visual Stack

All chains · top 10 + others
$1.59B
Gauntlet37.0%Steakhouse Financial33.0%SparkDAO19.8%Felix3.6%Yearn1.9%Hakutora1.6%Pangolins0.7%Anthias Labs0.7%MEV Capital0.6%Clearstar0.4%OTHERS0.6%
Ethereum only · top 10 + others
$488.82M
Steakhouse Financial52.0%Gauntlet31.1%Yearn5.5%Hakutora5.4%SparkDAO1.9%MEV Capital1.7%Clearstar0.9%Hyperithm0.4%Waterline0.4%AlphaPing0.2%OTHERS0.6%

Curator Reach Matrix. Top 10 × Top 8 chains

CuratorBaseEthereumHyperEVMKatanaArbitrumPolygonOP MainnetUnichain
Gauntlet$428.2M$151.95M$2.89M$166.47K$1.42M$1.41M$971.98K$670.21K
Steakhouse Financial$255.3M$254.42MN/A$11.53M$2.37M$29.69KN/A$5.27K
SparkDAO$305.95M$9.3MN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
FelixN/AN/A$57.93MN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Yearn$3.37M$26.66MN/A$17.08K$11.34KN/AN/AN/A
HakutoraN/A$26.19MN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Pangolins$11.87M$812.38N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Anthias Labs$10.58MN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
MEV Capital$53K$8.07M$947.98KN/A$652.18K$8.75N/A$108.5
Clearstar$1.81M$4.58MN/A$884.49$4.06K$2.88N/A$10.8

Top Curators

#CuratorAUMShareVaultsChainsNet APYBorrow Int.Curator FeesTake RateAUM 30d Δ
1Gauntlet$587.67M37.0%6793.75%$22.18M$151.81K0.7%-3.6%
2Steakhouse Financial$523.94M33.0%8383.46%$20.24M$2.09M10.3%-8.3%
3SparkDAO$315.25M19.9%323.85%$13.47M$1.31M9.7%+4124.1%
4Felix$57.93M3.6%1014.01%$2.59M$258.88K10.0%-22.9%
5Yearn$30.06M1.9%1944.80%$1.41M$60.27K4.3%-14.7%
6Hakutora$26.19M1.6%213.27%$1.01M$151.68K15.0%+9.2%
7Pangolins$11.87M0.7%323.84%$507.2K$50.72K10.0%-43.4%
8Anthias Labs$10.58M0.7%512.54%$293.36K$43.9K15.0%-44.3%
9MEV Capital$8.65M0.5%1862.88%$276.94K$27.39K9.9%-11.3%
10Clearstar$6.39M0.4%1861.96%$167.36K$41.47K24.8%-5.6%
11Hyperithm$2.61M0.2%1146.45%$188.08K$18.81K10.0%-9.8%
12Waterline$1.76M0.1%215.44%$92.04K$4.6K5.0%-6.5%
13RE7 Labs$1.13M0.1%3070.04%$521.22$52.1210.0%+18.3%
14AlphaPing$947.61K0.1%1012.97%$53.67K$25.08K46.7%-61.4%
15UltraYield$787.16K0.0%645.03%$39.63K$00.0%+88.2%
16August Digital$674.4K0.0%420.00%$0.12$00.0%-0.4%
17Avantgarde$343.25K0.0%420.00%$3.35$0.3310.0%+0.0%
18Apostro$307.51K0.0%520.14%$476.92$47.149.9%-58.5%
19SingularV$155.59K0.0%311.81%$3.14K$313.6410.0%+8.6%
209Summits$73.51K0.0%733.02%$2.39K$167.297.0%+1.2%
21Keyrock$44.4K0.0%1118.81%$8.35K$00.0%+0.1%
22KPK$41.29K0.0%622.39%$988.52$00.0%-10.1%
23K3 Capital$21.74K0.0%111.14%$276.2$27.6210.0%+17.6%
24Sentora$20.52K0.0%319.43%$1.94K$0.790.0%+0.0%
25Block Analitica$14.97K0.0%110.00%$0$0N/A+0.0%
26B.Protocol$13.7K0.0%3212.02%$1.65K$00.0%-14.0%
27Unified Labs$0.010.0%110.01%$0$015.0%+0.0%

Methodology

This page analyzes curators as asset managers for Morpho depositors. Lead metrics are AUM, borrow interest captured, fee take rate, and net APY delivered. Not curator TVL share alone. Per the framing principle adopted across this dashboard, sector position is treated as supporting context.

Fee Take Rate = curator fees ÷ borrow interest captured. The share of depositor-generated yield the curator retains. APYs are clamped at 100% per-vault and vaults reporting >100% APY are excluded before any aggregation, to drop degenerate-IRM markets. Structural identity uses vault.asset_symbol (the loan-asset side) as a proxy; true collateral-level allocation lives in vault_allocations_daily, currently empty.

Methodology

Curators analyzed as asset managers. AUM = Σ vault TVL; Borrow Interest Captured = Σ TVL × pre-fee APY; Curator Fees = × performance fee; Fee Take Rate = fees ÷ borrow interest captured; Net APY Delivered = AUM-weighted net_apy. APYs clamped at 100% and vaults reporting >100% APY are excluded (degenerate-IRM). The Curator Fees time series begins where per-vault fee capture becomes reliable; the source serves only the current fee, not a fee history.

Source: morpho_.vaults × morpho_.curators × morpho_.vault_state_daily
Cite this page

Datum Labs. (2026). Morpho Research Terminal: Curators. Asset managers. Retrieved September 7, 2026 from /curators.

Data as of 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC·Source: Morpho GraphQL · vault_state_daily × vaults.fee_recipient_address·Full methodology: /methodology