OverviewChainsCuratorsVaultsMarketsAssetsMethodology

Curators

26 active curators managing $2.31B across 11 chains · $85.5M borrow interest captured annually · $6.1M in fees

Concentration
CR3
89.3%
CR5
94.9%
HHI
3,253
highly concentrated
Largest AUM
$1.07B · 46.4% of Morpho-wide
Highest Borrow Interest Captured
$41.01M annualized
Highest Fee Take Rate
15.0% of interest kept
Highest Net APY Delivered
7.54% to depositors
Most Multi-Chain
9 chains
Fastest AUM Growth 30d
+14.6% over 30d

Curator AUM Over Time

Top curator: Steakhouse Financial at $1.07B (46.4%): -22.8% in 30 days

Steakhouse Financial
Gauntlet
Sentora
Felix
Yearn
Pangolins
Hakutora
Anthias Labs
Clearstar
MEV Capital
Other

Curator Economics

Cross-sectional view of curator performance

CuratorAUMBorrow Int.Curator FeesFee Take RateNet APYAUM 30d Δ
Steakhouse Financial$1.07B$41.01M$4.53M11.1%3.47%-22.8%
Gauntlet$704.46M$24.2M$297.36K1.2%3.49%-19.0%
Sentora$289.91M$7.06M$0.450.0%2.43%-37.3%
Felix$84.85M$7.14M$713.56K10.0%7.54%-27.2%
Yearn$43.31M$1.26M$83.47K6.6%4.82%+1.8%
Pangolins$27.91M$1.12M$00.0%4.00%+5.1%
Hakutora$27.6M$1.16M$174.26K15.0%3.57%+14.6%
Anthias Labs$18.57M$489.34K$72.79K14.9%2.98%-22.4%
Clearstar$10.46M$848.96K$90.46K10.7%7.22%-30.5%
MEV Capital$8.97M$375.22K$37.04K9.9%3.76%-15.9%
SparkDAO$8.81M$346.81K$31.51K9.1%3.57%-14.5%
Hyperithm$3.78M$227.38K$22.71K10.0%5.40%-24.3%
AlphaPing$3.31M$185.56K$18.56K10.0%5.02%-67.1%
RE7 Labs$1.24M$16.67K$2.7K16.2%1.12%-38.8%
SingularV$964.46K$26.59K$2.66K10.0%2.48%-22.4%

Curator Structural Identity

What each curator's book is composed of (by loan asset)

CuratorSTABLELSTLRTBTCETHRWAOTHER
Steakhouse Financial98%0%·0%2%·0%
Gauntlet83%··7%7%·3%
Sentora100%······
Felix66%·····34%
Yearn66%··7%15%·12%
Pangolins100%······
Hakutora100%······
Anthias Labs57%··6%37%··
Clearstar96%···4%·0%
MEV Capital56%··0%35%·8%
SparkDAO100%······
Hyperithm100%··0%0%·0%
AlphaPing64%···34%·2%
RE7 Labs41%··9%50%·0%
SingularV3%···97%··

Curator Performance Landscape

Fee take rate vs net APY delivered · bubble size = AUM

Stablecoins
ETH
Other
· bubble size = AUM

Curator Share. Visual Stack

All chains · top 10 + others
$2.31B
Steakhouse Financial46.3%Gauntlet30.5%Sentora12.5%Felix3.7%Yearn1.9%Pangolins1.2%Hakutora1.2%Anthias Labs0.8%Clearstar0.6%MEV Capital0.4%OTHERS0.9%
Ethereum only · top 10 + others
$998.96M
Steakhouse Financial41.4%Sentora29.0%Gauntlet21.7%Hakutora2.8%Yearn2.1%Clearstar1.0%MEV Capital0.8%AlphaPing0.3%Hyperithm0.3%SparkDAO0.1%OTHERS0.4%

Curator Reach Matrix. Top 10 × Top 8 chains

CuratorBaseEthereumHyperEVMKatanaArbitrumPolygonOP MainnetMonad
Steakhouse Financial$626.81M$413.53MN/A$24.95M$2.7M$282.77KN/A$2.55M
Gauntlet$453.25M$216.77M$2.67M$17.13M$4.37M$4.4M$4.22MN/A
SentoraN/A$289.91MN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
FelixN/AN/A$84.85MN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Yearn$4.05M$21.45MN/A$17.77M$34.33KN/AN/AN/A
Pangolins$27.91MN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
HakutoraN/A$27.6MN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Anthias Labs$18.57MN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Clearstar$3.33M$10.41MN/A$9.56K$64.41K$2.88N/AN/A
MEV Capital$52.58K$8.2M$769.89KN/AN/A$8.75N/AN/A

Top Curators

#CuratorAUMShareVaultsChainsNet APYBorrow Int.Curator FeesTake RateAUM 30d Δ
1Steakhouse Financial$1.07B46.4%8383.47%$41.01M$4.53M11.1%-22.8%
2Gauntlet$704.46M30.5%6993.49%$24.2M$297.36K1.2%-19.0%
3Sentora$289.91M12.6%312.43%$7.06M$0.450.0%-37.3%
4Felix$84.85M3.7%1017.54%$7.14M$713.56K10.0%-27.2%
5Yearn$43.31M1.9%1944.82%$1.26M$83.47K6.6%+1.8%
6Pangolins$27.91M1.2%114.00%$1.12M$00.0%+5.1%
7Hakutora$27.6M1.2%213.57%$1.16M$174.26K15.0%+14.6%
8Anthias Labs$18.57M0.8%512.98%$489.34K$72.79K14.9%-22.4%
9Clearstar$10.46M0.5%1767.22%$848.96K$90.46K10.7%-30.5%
10MEV Capital$8.97M0.4%1043.76%$375.22K$37.04K9.9%-15.9%
11SparkDAO$8.81M0.4%323.57%$346.81K$31.51K9.1%-14.5%
12Hyperithm$3.78M0.2%1145.40%$227.38K$22.71K10.0%-24.3%
13AlphaPing$3.31M0.1%1015.02%$185.56K$18.56K10.0%-67.1%
14RE7 Labs$1.24M0.1%1341.12%$16.67K$2.7K16.2%-38.8%
15SingularV$964.46K0.0%312.48%$26.59K$2.66K10.0%-22.4%
16UltraYield$870.51K0.0%643.72%$32.36K$00.0%-22.4%
17August Digital$677.04K0.0%520.02%$159.23$00.0%-91.5%
18B.Protocol$523.45K0.0%420.04%$228.1$00.0%-1.7%
19Avantgarde$402.11K0.0%420.21%$960.16$96.0210.0%-6.3%
20Apostro$347.7K0.0%520.12%$473.53$46.849.9%-16.7%
21KPK$110.64K0.0%622.85%$3.15K$00.0%-84.2%
22Keyrock$95.94K0.0%110.00%$0$0N/A-16.5%
239Summits$71.84K0.0%731.37%$1.06K$75.957.1%-16.2%
24K3 Capital$24.51K0.0%110.37%$102.13$10.2110.0%-74.4%
25Block Analitica$16.17K0.0%110.00%$0$0N/A-28.4%
26Unified Labs$0.010.0%110.01%$0$015.0%N/A

Methodology

This page analyzes curators as asset managers for Morpho depositors. Lead metrics are AUM, borrow interest captured, fee take rate, and net APY delivered. Not curator TVL share alone. Per the framing principle adopted across this dashboard, sector position is treated as supporting context.

Fee Take Rate = curator fees ÷ borrow interest captured. The share of depositor-generated yield the curator retains. APYs are clamped at 100% per-vault and vaults reporting >100% APY are excluded before any aggregation, to drop degenerate-IRM markets. Structural identity uses vault.asset_symbol (the loan-asset side) as a proxy; true collateral-level allocation lives in vault_allocations_daily, currently empty.

Methodology

Curators analyzed as asset managers. AUM = Σ vault TVL; Borrow Interest Captured = Σ TVL × pre-fee APY; Curator Fees = × performance fee; Fee Take Rate = fees ÷ borrow interest captured; Net APY Delivered = AUM-weighted net_apy. APYs clamped at 100% and vaults reporting >100% APY are excluded (degenerate-IRM). The Curator Fees time series begins where per-vault fee capture becomes reliable; the source serves only the current fee, not a fee history.

Source: morpho_.vaults × morpho_.curators × morpho_.vault_state_daily
Cite this page

Datum Labs. (2026). Morpho Research Terminal: Curators. Asset managers. Retrieved June 10, 2026 from /curators.

Data as of 2026-06-10 00:00 UTC·Source: Morpho GraphQL · vault_state_daily × vaults.fee_recipient_address·Full methodology: /methodology